Chapter I — The Language of Schemes
§3. Product of Preschemes
Translation status. This section is a translation skeleton: subsection headings and the principal definitions and statements are translated; longer proofs are summarized or referenced. Proofs in full follow the structure of and the source PDF.
3.1. Sums of preschemes
(3.1.1) Let be a family of preschemes. The topological sum carries a sheaf of rings whose restriction to each is . The ringed space is a prescheme, called the sum of the . The canonical injections are open immersions. For an -prescheme structure, the sum is the coproduct in the category of -preschemes.
3.2. Products of preschemes
Definition (3.2.1). Let , be -preschemes with structure morphisms and . A product of and over is an -prescheme together with -morphisms and (the canonical projections) such that, for every -prescheme , the map
Hom_S(T, Z) → Hom_S(T, X) × Hom_S(T, Y), u ↦ (p ∘ u, q ∘ u)
is a bijection. By the universal property, when it exists, is unique up to unique -isomorphism. Write .
Proposition (3.2.2). The product exists when , , and are affine. Specifically, if , , , then , with projections corresponding to and .
Corollary (3.2.3). For affine , exists if is affine over , etc.
Proposition (3.2.4). Existence of products is local: if it holds when , , are replaced by affine opens forming covers, then it holds in general.
Theorem (3.2.6). For any -preschemes , , the product exists.
The proof glues affine local products using a cocycle argument and (3.2.4); see Lemmas (3.2.6.1)–(3.2.6.4).
Corollary (3.2.7). Products are functorial: for -morphisms , , there is a unique -morphism compatible with projections.
3.3. Formal properties of the product; change of base prescheme
(3.3.1) Commutativity: there is a canonical isomorphism .
(3.3.2) Associativity: for three -preschemes, .
Proposition (3.3.3). Identity: canonically.
Corollary (3.3.4). For a morphism, the base change is an -prescheme,
with structure morphism the second projection. This is a functor
(S\text{-preschemes}) → (S′\text{-preschemes}).
Proposition (3.3.9). Transitivity of base change: for , .
Corollary (3.3.10). Base change commutes with finite products: .
Corollary (3.3.11). Open immersions are preserved by base change: if is an open immersion, so is .
3.4. Points of a prescheme with values in a prescheme; geometric points
Definition (3.4.1). Let be an -prescheme, an -prescheme. A -valued point of (or -point) is an -morphism ; the set of such is .
(3.4.2) A fiber product of sets: for sets , .
Proposition (3.4.3). for every -prescheme .
(3.4.4) Points with values in a ring : if , write . For , X(A) = Hom_{C\text{-alg}}(\text{some algebra}, A) when is affine.
(3.4.5) Geometric points. A geometric point of is a morphism for a field. The value field of the geometric point is . A geometric point above is a geometric point whose composition with factors through . A geometric point localized at is one whose underlying map sends the unique point to .
Lemma (3.4.6). Geometric points of above correspond to pairs with over and an extension of .
Proposition (3.4.7). For an -morphism, every geometric point of maps via to a geometric point of with the same value field.
3.5. Surjections and injections
Proposition (3.5.2). A morphism is surjective iff every geometric point of lifts to a geometric point of .
Proposition (3.5.3). Surjectivity is preserved by base change: if is surjective and is a morphism, then is surjective.
Definition (3.5.4). A morphism is radicial (or universally injective) if for every base change , is injective; equivalently, for every field , is injective. A radicial morphism is injective.
Proposition (3.5.6). is radicial iff it is injective and induces purely inseparable residue-field extensions at every point.
Proposition (3.5.7). Composition and base change preserve radicial morphisms.
Proposition (3.5.8). Geometric injection: is radicial iff the diagonal is surjective.
3.6. Fibers
Proposition (3.6.1). For an -prescheme with structure morphism , and a geometric point , the fiber is a -prescheme. Set-theoretically, the underlying space of (where ) is .
Proposition (3.6.4). Fibers commute with base change: ().
Proposition (3.6.5). Surjectivity and radiciality of a morphism are detected fiber-by-fiber.
3.7. Reduction mod 𝔍
For an ideal and an -prescheme , the reduction is . This is a functor from -preschemes to -preschemes.